Free & open · no paywall, ever

IntegrAuth Academy

Identity, security and practical AI — free, from zero. Byte-sized lessons, real diagrams, hands-on labs, zero fluff. Two programs, each with its own exam and certificate.

20 tracks 241 lessons 242 hands-on labs 230+ diagrams 100% free

English is hard? Your browser can translate this page into Tamil, Telugu, Kannada, Malayalam or Hindi. Tech words stay in English so you learn the real names.

How?
  • Chrome on phone: ⋮ menu → Translate
  • Chrome on computer: right-click → Translate to …
  • Edge: the translate icon in the address bar
Practical AI Track 0 · AI from Zero
0/75 lessons read
AI FROM ZERO · LESSON 2

Where AI is strong, and where it fails

AI fixed Priya's email in seconds. Then it added up her receipts wrong, and sounded just as sure. Your goal: know where AI fails, and how much to check.

🧪 Interactive lab — enable JavaScript to play with this one.

harder for a person →different everyday tasks (in real life the line is invisible)the frontierabove the line: AI quietly failsbelow the line: AI does well12345678Below the line — AI does well1 · Rewrite an email politely2 · Summarize a report you provide3 · Explain a concept at your level4 · Brainstorm twenty names5 · Translate a menuAbove the line — AI quietly fails6 · Cite real sources from memory7 · Add up 40 receipts without a calculator tool8 · Report yesterday's news without web search
Figure — Watch the dips. Tasks 6 to 8 feel easy, yet AI often gets them wrong. This map is only an example.
Key points
  • AI is great at some jobs and bad at others that look just as easy. This uneven edge is the Jagged frontier.
  • It does well when many answers are fine and you can judge the result fast, like drafts and ideas.
  • It often fails at exact facts, sources, sums and recent news.
  • Tools like web search and code fix some failures. No sign of a tool? The answer came from memory.
  • Match your checking to the stakes: what a mistake would cost.

Why it fails

AI writes the words that seem most likely. So it can make up a source that looks real. This is called a Hallucination. It knows nothing after its training text ends. That date is its Knowledge cutoff.

Match your checking to the stakes

Ask 2 questions. What if this is wrong? Could I tell? Then pick a step, or rung, on this ladder.

what a mistake would cost →3 · Keep the decision humanMedical, legal and money decisions; judging people; anything you can't check or can't undo.AI can help you prepare, by explaining terms or listing questions. A qualified person, and you, decide.2 · Use it, then verifyFacts, numbers, quotes, dates, code you'll run, summaries of things you haven't read:anything you'll act on, send or publish. Check against the source, not against the AI.1 · Use freelyBrainstorms, rewording your own text, a packing list, a first draft you'll rewrite anyway:low stakes, and you can judge the result at a glance.
Figure — Climb the ladder as the stakes rise. Check against the source before you send or act. At the top, a person decides.

Lunch ideas are rung 1. A shop's opening hours are rung 2. Whether a lump needs a doctor is rung 3.

Guess which tasks AI gets wrong. Then turn on tools.

🧪 Interactive lab — enable JavaScript to play with this one.

Go deeper: the research

In 2023, researchers from Harvard Business School, Wharton, MIT and others studied 758 consultants at Boston Consulting Group. On 18 tasks the AI could handle, people with AI finished 12.2% more tasks. They were 25.1% faster, and their work was over 40% better. One task was picked to be just outside what the AI could do. There, people with AI did worse. Out of every 100 people, about 19 fewer got it right. The researchers called this uneven edge a "jagged technological frontier." Read more in Centaurs and Cyborgs on the Jagged Frontier.

In a 2025 study by the research group METR, skilled software developers used early-2025 AI tools. They took 19% longer on their tasks. Yet they believed AI had made them about 20% faster. In February 2026, METR said newer tools probably help developers more now. But it called its own new data weak evidence. So the lesson is not "AI slows you down." It is that a feeling is not a measurement.

Go deeper: weak spots and fixes
  • Facts, quotes and sources. It may invent them. Open every source it gives. Or give it the document and ask it to quote from it.
  • Sums. It predicts digits as text instead of doing math. So long sums can go wrong. Ask it to run code, or use a calculator.
  • Counting letters. It reads text in chunks, not letter by letter. So "How many r's are in strawberry?" can go wrong. Newer models usually get it right.
  • Recent events. Use web search, and check the dates on what it finds.
  • Rare topics. It saw little text about them, so its guesses are weaker. Check original sources, or ask experts.
  • Long documents and chats. It can miss details in the middle. Ask about one part at a time.
  • Agreeing with you. It learned partly from people's ratings of answers. So it leans toward what you seem to want to hear. This is called Sycophancy. Ask neutral questions, and ask for the case against. See when AI makes things up.
Go deeper: what AI does well
  • ✍️ Drafting emails, letters and outlines.
  • 🔄 Rewriting for tone, length or plain words.
  • 📝 Summarizing text you give it. This is far safer than asking it to remember a text.
  • 🌍 Translating everyday text between common languages. Take more care with rare languages, and with legal or medical text.
  • 💡 Brainstorming names, ideas and questions to ask.
  • 🎓 Explaining an idea at your level, as many times as you need.
  • 💻 Code for small programs and spreadsheet formulas. You can run it to check it.
Go deeper: how tools work

A tool is an extra program the model asks the app to run. Then the model reads the result. See tool calling. As of September 2026, ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Le Chat all offer some way to run code. Most apps show when a tool ran, like a list of sites or the code.

Priya asked again: "Use code to add these up and show me the calculation." This time she got a total she could follow. Still, tools do not fix everything. The model picks what to search for. It can choose a poor source or misread a good one. And no tool stops it from agreeing with you.

Watch out

The frontier moves, and each model is different. Test it on a question you can already answer. And "Are you sure?" is not a real check.

🧪 Try it free

Try 5 tasks from your week in a free assistant. Include 1 you already know the answer to. When it fails, turn on web search or ask it to "use code."